Compare phones
Samsung SPH-A800
MM-A800Motorola DROID Turbo
64 GB| Global Score | |
| 31.2 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| -- | 2014-10-28 |
| 3.91 x 1.94 x 0.94 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 4.30 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| -- | Black and Blue |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 130.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 5.2 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| -- | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 3.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| -- | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 4.73 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 0.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4 hours talk time | -- |
| 1.36 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo has a general score of 77.9, which is way better than Samsung SPH-A800's 31.2 overall score. The Motorola DROID Turbo design is a lot heavier but noticeably thinner than Samsung SPH-A800. The Motorola DROID Turbo features an extremely better CPU than Samsung SPH-A800, because it has more processing cores and a graphics processor.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung SPH-A800, because it has a way better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. The Motorola DROID Turbo takes much better photos and videos than Samsung SPH-A800, because it has a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a superior storage for applications and games than Samsung SPH-A800, although it has no slot for external memory cards. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung SPH-A800.
Motorola DROID Turbo costs a bit more money than the Samsung SPH-A800, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.