Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 40.7 | 44.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 2.2 |
| 2012-01-19 | 2011-06-01 |
| 4.02 x 2.28 x 0.45 inches | 4.48 x 2.31 x 0.55 inches |
| 3.35 ounces | 4.58 ounces |
| $ 429.00 | $ 290.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3 inches | 3.2 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | -- |
| TFT | -- |
| 133 pixels per inch | 125 pixels per inch |
| Yes | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.4 | 5.8 |
| processor | Single-Core 600 MHz processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 6.75 |
| Storage | |
| 20,48 MB internal memory | -- |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
| 1.3 | 0 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP | 3.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | -- |
| 220 x 176 video resolution | 320 x 240 (14 fps) (QVGA) video resolution |
| 5.83 | 5.39 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 2.8 | 3.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 625 hours standby time 14.7 hours talk time | 364 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 3.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 3.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Q has a score of 44.5, which is slightly better than the Samsung Star 3's 40.7 global score. Despite being the best in this comparison review, it must be told that it's also a way heavier and thicker cellphone. Samsung Galaxy Q counts with a better CPU than Samsung Star 3, because it has more cores.
Galaxy Q features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Star 3, because although it has a just a little worse quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit bigger display. Samsung Star 3 has a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy Q. The Samsung Galaxy Q counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Star 3, because it has a 1500mAh battery capacity against 1000mAh.
The Samsung Star 3 takes a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Q, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Samsung Star 3 also has a camera in the back with more MP.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy Q is also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.