Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 40.7 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| 2012-01-19 | 2018-08-29 |
| 4.02 x 2.28 x 0.45 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 3.35 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 429.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 133 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Yes | No touch screen |
| 5.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| -- | 8 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 20,48 MB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.3 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 220 x 176 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 5.83 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 2.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 625 hours standby time 14.7 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is way better than Samsung Star 3, having a global score of 85.5 against 40.7. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a much newer and incredibly thinner cellphone than the Samsung Star 3, but it's also noticeably heavier. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much powerful processing unit than Samsung Star 3, because it has a larger number of cores.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a much better display than Samsung Star 3, because it has a much greater screen pixel density, a much larger display and a way better 1080 x 2246 resolution. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Star 3, because it has more internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that allows up to 256 GB.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a much longer battery performance than Samsung Star 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 1000mAh. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a lot better camera than Samsung Star 3, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a way larger aperture to take better images in low-light environments and a back facing camera with a way higher resolution.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.