Global Score | |
38.4 | 41.5 |
Basic Information | |
Samsung | Samsung |
2009-03-10 | 2009-02-09 |
4.09 x 2.09 x 0.47 inches | 4.33 x 2.03 x 0.50 inches |
3.25 ounces | 4.16 ounces |
-- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
$ 80.00 | $ 75.00 |
Display / Screen | |
3 inches | 2.8 inches |
240 x 400 pixels | 240 x 400 pixels |
TFT | AMOLED |
155 pixels per inch | 167 pixels per inch |
Resistive | Capacitive |
5.9 | 6.3 |
processor | processor |
GPU | GPU |
5.76 | 5.76 |
Storage | |
51,2 MB internal memory | 81,92 MB internal memory |
microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
0.4 | 0.5 |
Camera | |
3.20 MP | 8.00 MP |
320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution | 640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution |
5.39 | 6.6 |
EDGE and GSM | HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
SIM | SIM |
0.3 | 0.9 |
Battery Life | |
1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 880mAh Li-Ion Battery |
Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
800 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | 300 hours standby time 4 hours talk time |
2.56 | 2.4 |
Other Features | |
Bluetooth 2.1 | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
-- | GPS |
Accelerometer | Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor |
FM Radio | -- |
Samsung UltraTouch is just a bit better than the Samsung Star, getting a 41.5 score against 38.4. The Samsung UltraTouch is better than the Samsung Star, it must be told that it is also a heavier and just a bit thicker cellphone. Samsung UltraTouch counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Star, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 400 x 240px, the Samsung UltraTouch also counts with a quite greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
The Samsung UltraTouch features a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Star, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 30,72 MB more internal memory. Samsung UltraTouch has a processor that is just as good as the CPU in Samsung Star, both of them have a 0-Core CPU.
Samsung UltraTouch shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung Star, because it has a way higher 640x480 video resolution and a way higher 8 mega pixels resolution back facing camera. Samsung Star has a little longer battery performance than Samsung UltraTouch, because it has a 14% more battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Samsung UltraTouch is also a bit cheaper, making it easy to pick between these phones.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.