Compare phones
Samsung Star WiFi
GT-S5233W, GT-S5230WPantech Pocket
P9060| Global Score | |
| 40.5 | 41.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Pantech |
| -- | Android 2.3 |
| -- | 2011-10-11 |
| 4.09 x 2.09 x 0.47 inches | 4.52 x 3.07 x 0.44 inches |
| 3.25 ounces | 4.66 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| $ 80.00 | $ 75.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3 inches | 4 inches |
| 240 x 400 pixels | 600 x 800 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 155 pixels per inch | 250 pixels per inch |
| Resistive | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.9 | 7.4 |
| processor | Single-Core 1000 MHz processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 7.2 |
| Storage | |
| 51,2 MB internal memory | 614,4 MB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 0.4 | 2.52 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 5.00 MP |
| 320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution |
| 5.39 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| EDGE and GSM | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 2.7 | 3.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1650mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 700 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | 432 hours standby time 6 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 3.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1 | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| -- | GPS |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Pantech Pocket is a little bit better than the Samsung Star WiFi, having a general score of 41.1 against 40.5. Pantech Pocket's construction is extremely heavier but just a little bit thinner than Samsung Star WiFi. Pantech Pocket has a much more vibrant display than Samsung Star WiFi, because it has a way larger screen, a lot more pixels per inch of display and a way higher resolution of 800 x 600.
Pantech Pocket counts with a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Star WiFi, because it has 614,4 MB internal memory capacity. The Pantech Pocket features a much powerful processing unit than Samsung Star WiFi, because it has a greater number of faster cores. The Pantech Pocket has a very superior battery life than Samsung Star WiFi, because it has 1650mAh of battery capacity.
Pantech Pocket counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Star WiFi, because it has a camera with a lot higher resolution and a way better video resolution.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Pantech Pocket is also the cheapest, making this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.