Search


Compare phones

Samsung Star WiFi

GT-S5233W, GT-S5230W
Global Score
40.541.1
Basic Information
SamsungPantech
--Android 2.3
--2011-10-11
4.09 x 2.09 x 0.47 inches4.52 x 3.07 x 0.44 inches
3.25 ounces4.66 ounces
--Black
$ 80.00$ 75.00
Display / Screen
3 inches4 inches
240 x 400 pixels 600 x 800 pixels
TFTTFT
155 pixels per inch250 pixels per inch
ResistiveCapacitive, Multi-touch
5.97.4
processor Single-Core 1000 MHz processor
GPU GPU
5.767.2
Storage
51,2 MB internal memory614,4 MB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
0.42.52
Camera
3.00 MP5.00 MP
320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution
5.395.5
Networks
Wi-FiWi-Fi
EDGE and GSMHSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM
SIMSIM
2.73.9
Battery Life
1000mAh Li-Ion Battery1650mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
700 hours standby time
10 hours talk time
432 hours standby time
6 hours talk time
2.563.52
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1Bluetooth 2.1, EDR
--GPS
AccelerometerAccelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor
FM Radio--

Comparison review

Pantech Pocket is a little bit better than the Samsung Star WiFi, having a general score of 41.1 against 40.5. Pantech Pocket's construction is extremely heavier but just a little bit thinner than Samsung Star WiFi. Pantech Pocket has a much more vibrant display than Samsung Star WiFi, because it has a way larger screen, a lot more pixels per inch of display and a way higher resolution of 800 x 600.

Pantech Pocket counts with a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Star WiFi, because it has 614,4 MB internal memory capacity. The Pantech Pocket features a much powerful processing unit than Samsung Star WiFi, because it has a greater number of faster cores. The Pantech Pocket has a very superior battery life than Samsung Star WiFi, because it has 1650mAh of battery capacity.

Pantech Pocket counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Star WiFi, because it has a camera with a lot higher resolution and a way better video resolution.

Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Pantech Pocket is also the cheapest, making this phone a simple decision.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.