Compare phones
Samsung Star WiFi
GT-S5233W, GT-S5230WSamsung UltraTouch
GT-S8300| Global Score | |
| 40.5 | 41.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | 2009-02-09 |
| 4.09 x 2.09 x 0.47 inches | 4.33 x 2.03 x 0.50 inches |
| 3.25 ounces | 4.16 ounces |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 80.00 | $ 75.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3 inches | 2.8 inches |
| 240 x 400 pixels | 240 x 400 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 155 pixels per inch | 167 pixels per inch |
| Resistive | Capacitive |
| 5.9 | 6.3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 51,2 MB internal memory | 81,92 MB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
| 0.4 | 0.5 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 8.00 MP |
| 320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution | 640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution |
| 5.39 | 6.6 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| EDGE and GSM | HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 2.7 | 0.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 880mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 700 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | 300 hours standby time 4 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 2.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1 | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| -- | GPS |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung UltraTouch has a score of 41.5, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Star WiFi's score of 40.5. Samsung UltraTouch is a a little bit thicker and heavier cellphone than Samsung Star WiFi. The Samsung UltraTouch has a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Star WiFi, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 400 x 240 resolution, the Samsung UltraTouch also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the display.
Samsung UltraTouch counts with a processing unit that is just as good as the Samsung Star WiFi one, both of them have the same number of cores. The Samsung UltraTouch shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung Star WiFi, because it has a much better 640x480 video definition and a camera with much more mega-pixels.
Samsung UltraTouch counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Star WiFi, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 30,72 MB more internal storage. The Samsung Star WiFi counts with just a little better battery life than Samsung UltraTouch, because it has a 14 percent bigger battery size.
The Samsung UltraTouch is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.