Compare phones
Samsung Vibrant
SGH-T959| Global Score | |
| 55.4 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 2.2, 2.1 | -- |
| 2010-06-28 | 2020-02-03 |
| 4.82 x 2.54 x 0.39 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.16 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| -- | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 280.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 233 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A8 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| -- | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX540 (200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 7.38 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.27 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 450 hours standby time 6.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a global score of 89.7, which is a lot better than the Samsung Vibrant's 55.4 global score. Although Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is way heavier than the Samsung Vibrant, it's somewhat thinner and a lot newer. Galaxy S10 Lite has a lot better hardware performance than Samsung Vibrant, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Vibrant, because it has a really larger display, a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a much better screen pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a lot better camera than Samsung Vibrant, because it has a back facing camera with a much higher resolution and a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a much greater storage for apps and games than Samsung Vibrant, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external memory card slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy S10 Lite has a superior battery performance than Samsung Vibrant, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Galaxy S10 Lite is also cheaper than the other phone, making buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.