Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | -- |
| -- | 2017-09-22 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 383 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 8 is much better than the Samsung W2016, getting a score of 85 against 72.2. The Apple iPhone 8 construction is lighter and noticeably thinner than the Samsung W2016. IPhone 8 has a quite better processing power than Samsung W2016, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster) and lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
IPhone 8 counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung W2016, because although it has a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly better 750 x 1334px resolution. IPhone 8 takes clearer photographs and videos than Samsung W2016, because although it has a lot lower resolution back-facing camera and a lower video definition, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and video.
Apple iPhone 8 has a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Samsung W2016, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Samsung W2016 counts with a bit better battery duration than iPhone 8, because it has a 10% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.