Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | -- |
| -- | 2018-09-21 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS Max is better than Samsung W2016, with an 84.5 score against 72.2. The iPhone XS Max design is somewhat heavier but noticeably thinner than the Samsung W2016. IPhone XS Max has a greater processing power than Samsung W2016, because although it has less cpu cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and more RAM memory.
The iPhone XS Max counts with a sharper screen than Samsung W2016, because it has a little bit better count of pixels in each display inch, a lot higher 1242 x 2688 resolution and a way bigger screen. The iPhone XS Max's memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is just as good as the Samsung W2016 one, both of them have exactly the same internal storage.
IPhone XS Max captures a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung W2016, because although it has a worse (4K) video quality and a way worse resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better photos in low-light environments. Apple iPhone XS Max has a way better battery performance than Samsung W2016, because it has 3179mAh of battery capacity against 2000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.