Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | -- |
| -- | 2017-08-03 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.25 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Metal | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus ZenFone AR is slightly better than the Samsung W2016, with a overall score of 77.4 against 72.2. Asus ZenFone AR is a just a bit lighter and way thinner cellphone than Samsung W2016. Samsung W2016 features a little better processing power than Asus ZenFone AR, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with 4 more CPU cores (but slower).
The Asus ZenFone AR features a bit sharper screen than Samsung W2016, because it has a much higher 1440 x 2560 resolution, a higher pixels density and a much bigger display. Asus ZenFone AR counts with much more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung W2016, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Asus ZenFone AR counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung W2016, because although it has a tinier aperture and worse 24 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Asus ZenFone AR also counts with a back-facing camera with way more MP. The Asus ZenFone AR has a superior battery life than Samsung W2016, because it has a 3300mAh battery size instead of 2000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.