Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is much better than Samsung W2016, getting an 83.7 score against 72.2. Both phones in this review have Android OS (Operating System), but LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version and Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop version. The LG V50 ThinQ construction is thinner but just a little bit heavier than Samsung W2016.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a bit better hardware performance than Samsung W2016, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. The LG V50 ThinQ has a brighter display than Samsung W2016, because it has a better pixel number per screen inch, a lot bigger display and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a slightly better camera than Samsung W2016, because although it has a camera with much less MP resolution and a lower 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a way bigger diafragm aperture to take better captures and video in low-light environments. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung W2016, because it has a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ has a very superior battery life than Samsung W2016, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.