Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 4.4.4 |
| -- | 2014-10-28 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Blue |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Droid Turbo is a little bit better than the Samsung W2016, getting a 76.4 score against 72.2. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Motorola Droid Turbo has older 4.4.4 version while Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop. The Motorola Droid Turbo is a a little lighter and noticeably thinner cellphone than the Samsung W2016.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung W2016, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with an additional GPU. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a much better looking display than Samsung W2016, because it has a much higher 2560 x 1440 resolution, a much larger screen and a better pixel count in each inch of display.
Samsung W2016 features a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 64 GB internal memory. The Motorola Droid Turbo has a way better battery life than Samsung W2016, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Droid Turbo shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Samsung W2016, because although it has worse 24 fps video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting photos or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.