Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 4.4.4 |
| -- | 2014-10-28 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Blue |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a general score of 77.9, which is a little bit better than Samsung W2016's general score of 72.2. The Motorola DROID Turbo is a a lot thinner and just a little bit lighter phone than the Samsung W2016. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola DROID Turbo has older 4.4.4 version while Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a way better looking display than Samsung W2016, because it has a higher display density, a lot higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a lot bigger screen. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit better CPU than Samsung W2016, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with an additional GPU.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung W2016, because although it has worse 24 fps video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is worse for shooting images or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a way better 20.7 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
Motorola DROID Turbo's memory to install games and applications is very similar to Samsung W2016's one, they have exactly the same internal storage capacity. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a much longer battery duration than Samsung W2016, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.