Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-08-08 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 is much better than the Samsung W2016, having an 81.2 score against 72.2. The Motorola Edge 50 is a way thinner cellphone than Samsung W2016, but both of them have equal weights. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 has the previous 14 version and Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop.
Motorola Edge 50 features a sharper screen than Samsung W2016, because it has a way higher 1220 x 2712 resolution, a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a way larger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 has a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Samsung W2016, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung W2016 features a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Edge 50 features a much better battery performance than Samsung W2016, because it has a 150 percent greater battery size. The Motorola Edge 50 captures greater photographs and videos than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography and video and a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.