Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-06-06 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gray and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto Z4 is better than Samsung W2016, having a 79.8 score against 72.2. The Moto Z4 construction is just a bit lighter and a lot thinner than the Samsung W2016. These phones have Android operating system, but the Moto Z4 has the older 10 version while Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop. The Moto Z4 features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung W2016, because it has a just a little more pixels per inch of screen, a much higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a really bigger display.
Motorola Moto Z4 has a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Samsung W2016, because it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Moto Z4 and Samsung W2016 have incredibly similar CPUs, and although the Moto Z4 has a larger amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Moto Z4 counts with a much longer battery performance than Samsung W2016, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity instead of 2000mAh. Moto Z4 takes greater videos and photos than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Moto Z4 also has a larger camera aperture and a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.