Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android |
| -- | 2021-01-22 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Metal | Metal and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 383 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is much better than the Samsung W2016's general score of 72.2. Galaxy A32 counts with Android operating system, and Samsung W2016 works with Android 5.1 Lollipop operating system. The Galaxy A32 construction is notably thinner but heavier than Samsung W2016.
The Galaxy A32's processing unit is very similar to Samsung W2016's processor, and although the Galaxy A32 has more RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Samsung W2016 features a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a lot smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 768 x 1280 pixels, it also counts with a better screen pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a better camera than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a bigger camera aperture and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels. The Galaxy A32 has a much greater storage for games and applications than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A32 also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A32 counts with a way better battery performance than Samsung W2016, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.