Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-03 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 8 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is just a bit better than Samsung W2016, with a score of 77.8 against 72.2. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the previous 14 version and Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop version. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a much thinner but somewhat heavier phone than the Samsung W2016.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung W2016, because it has a much larger display, a much better 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution and a just a little more pixels per inch of screen. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung W2016, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung W2016 features a really superior processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 13 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung W2016, because it has a way higher video definition, a larger aperture and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much longer battery life than Samsung W2016, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 2000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.