Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-04-02 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X60 Pro has a score of 78.8, which is a bit better than the Samsung W2016's global score of 72.2. The vivo X60 Pro is a a lot thinner and a little lighter cellphone than Samsung W2016. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (operating system), but vivo X60 Pro has 11 version and Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with just a bit better looking screen than Samsung W2016, because it has a bit higher number of pixels per screen inch, a way bigger display and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2376. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung W2016, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
The vivo X60 Pro features a way better camera than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also has a back camera with lot more mega pixels, higher video frame rate and a larger camera aperture. Vivo X60 Pro has much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung W2016, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a really longer battery life than Samsung W2016, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.