Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | -- |
| -- | 2018-08-29 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and Red |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 383 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is better than Samsung W2016, with an 85.5 score against 72.2. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a notably thinner phone than Samsung W2016, but both of them weight the same. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a little faster CPU than Samsung W2016, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a little more vivid display than Samsung W2016, because it has a lot larger screen, a little greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2246. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung W2016, although it has a camera with much less mega pixels resolution and a worse video quality, they both have a same size aperture.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung W2016, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 256 GB and 192 GB more internal storage. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much longer battery duration than Samsung W2016, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.