Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| -- | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.03 x 2.42 x 0.62 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 525 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max has a general score of 84.5, which is better than the Samsung W2017's global score of 73.2. IPhone XS Max's design weights the same than the Samsung W2017, but it's way thinner. The iPhone XS Max has a bit better looking screen than Samsung W2017, because although it has a bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a way bigger screen and a better resolution of 1242 x 2688.
IPhone XS Max counts with a quite superior hardware performance than Samsung W2017, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the iPhone XS Max also has a greater number of cores and a 64 bits CPU. The iPhone XS Max shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung W2017, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same video resolution and a same resolution camera, the iPhone XS Max also counts with higher 60 fps video frame rate.
The Samsung W2017 counts with much more memory to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone XS Max, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Samsung W2017 also has a SD card slot that holds up to 256 GB. Apple iPhone XS Max features a really longer battery performance than Samsung W2017, because it has a 38% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.