Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-08-08 |
| 5.03 x 2.42 x 0.62 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 525 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.35 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 is much better than the Samsung W2017, getting a global score of 81.2 against 73.2. Motorola Edge 50's design is lighter and thinner than the Samsung W2017. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 has the older 14 version while Samsung W2017 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
Samsung W2017 has a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 4 less processing cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory. Motorola Edge 50 has a more vivid screen than Samsung W2017, because although it has a little lower pixel number in each inch of screen, it also counts with a lot larger display and a higher resolution of 1220 x 2712.
Motorola Edge 50 features a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung W2017, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 has a way better battery life than Samsung W2017, because it has a 117 percent larger battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 captures a lot better photos and videos than Samsung W2017, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a much more MP back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.