Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-06-19 |
| 5.03 x 2.42 x 0.62 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 525 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G has an overall score of 91.8, which is a lot better than Samsung W2017's global score of 73.2. Galaxy A71 5G's body is lighter and incredibly thinner than Samsung W2017. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS, but the Galaxy A71 5G has the previous 11 version and Samsung W2017 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Samsung W2017 has just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a really smaller display, it also counts with a better count of pixels per inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung W2017, because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A71 5G features a little better hardware performance than Samsung W2017, because it has a greater number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A71 5G takes a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung W2017, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light captures, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a camera with way more MP.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much longer battery performance than Samsung W2017, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.