Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| -- | 2018-08-24 |
| 5.03 x 2.42 x 0.62 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 525 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 is better than Samsung W2017, getting an 87.1 score against 73.2. Galaxy Note9's construction is a bit lighter and noticeably thinner than Samsung W2017. The Galaxy Note9 counts with a slightly better screen than Samsung W2017, because although it has a quite inferior number of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a really larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a much greater memory for apps and games than Samsung W2017, because it has a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB and more internal storage. The Galaxy Note9 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung W2017, because it has 2 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung W2017, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same resolution back facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photography and videos and higher 60 fps video frame rates.
Galaxy Note9 has a much better battery lifetime than Samsung W2017, because it has a 74 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.