Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.03 x 2.42 x 0.62 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 525 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than the Samsung W2017, with a score of 77.8 against 73.2. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a noticeably thinner but just a little heavier phone than the Samsung W2017. Both phones in this review use Android OS (operating system), but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the older 14 version and Samsung W2017 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Samsung W2017 has an extremely better processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower number of cores and lesser RAM. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features an incredibly better screen than Samsung W2017, because although it has a bit lower display density, it also counts with a way higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and a really bigger display.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung W2017, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better battery performance than Samsung W2017, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung W2017, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a way higher resolution back facing camera and a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.