Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.03 x 2.42 x 0.62 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 525 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.35 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X60 Pro has a score of 78.8, which is a bit better than the Samsung W2017's global score of 73.2. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the vivo X60 Pro has older 11 version and Samsung W2017 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. The vivo X60 Pro is a much thinner and lighter phone than Samsung W2017.
The vivo X60 Pro has a greater processing power than Samsung W2017, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a larger number of cores. Samsung W2017 has a little bit better screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a much smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen.
Vivo X60 Pro features a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung W2017, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a much better camera than Samsung W2017, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rates and a camera with way more mega pixels.
Vivo X60 Pro has a very superior battery duration than Samsung W2017, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.