Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| -- | 2018-08-29 |
| 5.03 x 2.42 x 0.62 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 525 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is better than the Samsung W2017, having a general score of 85.5 against 73.2. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a extremely thinner and lighter cellphone than the Samsung W2017. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little bit better processing power than Samsung W2017, because it has 4 GB more RAM and more cpu cores.
Samsung W2017 and Xiaomi Pocophone F1 both count with incredibly similar displays, because although the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a just a bit worse display density, it also counts with a much bigger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2246px resolution. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung W2017, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same resolution back camera and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also counts with better 60 fps video frame rate.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung W2017, and although they both have an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a very superior battery performance than Samsung W2017, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.