Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 25.5 | 27.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sanyo | Cricket |
| -- | 2009-09-22 |
| 3.33 x 1.86 x 1.14 inches | 3.54 x 1.81 x 0.74 inches |
| 3.88 ounces | 2.82 ounces |
| $ 40.00 | $ 40.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.8 inches |
| 120 x 144 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| -- | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 5.4 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| Camera | |
| 0.10 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 3.08 | 3.63 |
| CDMA | CDMA |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 920mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 257 hours standby time 2.8 hours talk time | 250 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 2.48 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth |
| GPS | -- |
Comparison review
The Cricket CAPTR is slightly better than the Sanyo SCP-8100, having a 27.9 score against 25.5. Cricket CAPTR's design is much lighter and noticeably thinner than Sanyo SCP-8100. The Cricket CAPTR's processing unit is very similar to the CPU in Sanyo SCP-8100, they have 0 CPU cores. The Cricket CAPTR features a much sharper display than Sanyo SCP-8100, because it has a little bit higher 160 x 128 pixels resolution.
Cricket CAPTR shoots much clearer videos and photos than Sanyo SCP-8100, because it has a way more MP camera in the back. Cricket CAPTR's memory to install games and applications is just as good as the Sanyo SCP-8100 one. Sanyo SCP-8100 features just a bit better battery lifetime than Cricket CAPTR, because it has 1000mAh of battery capacity.
The Cricket CAPTR costs the same than Sanyo SCP-8100, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.