Compare phones
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 53.5 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sharp | |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.16 x 2.64 x 0.39 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 8926 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 1,5 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.62 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2040mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 13 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a general score of 82.5, which is way better than the Sharp AQUOS Crystal's 53.5 overall score. The Google Pixel 2 XL design is way thinner but somewhat heavier than the Sharp AQUOS Crystal. Google Pixel 2 XL has a quite better hardware performance than Sharp AQUOS Crystal, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with 2,5 GB more RAM memory and more CPU cores.
Google Pixel 2 XL counts with just a bit better display than Sharp AQUOS Crystal, because it has a lot higher 1440 x 2880px resolution, a larger screen and a lot better pixels density. The Google Pixel 2 XL captures much clearer pictures and videos than Sharp AQUOS Crystal, because it has a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a way better 12.2 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
Google Pixel 2 XL features a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Sharp AQUOS Crystal, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Google Pixel 2 XL features a superior battery duration than Sharp AQUOS Crystal, because it has 3520mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 2 XL is a bit more expensive than the Sharp AQUOS Crystal, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.