Compare phones
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 53.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sharp | |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.16 x 2.64 x 0.39 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 8926 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 1,5 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.62 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2040mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 13 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has an overall score of 80, which is a lot better than Sharp AQUOS Crystal's 53.5 global score. The Google Pixel 3 construction is incredibly thinner but just a little heavier than Sharp AQUOS Crystal. Google Pixel 3 counts with a faster processor than Sharp AQUOS Crystal, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with 2,5 GB more RAM and a higher number of cores.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a slightly better screen than Sharp AQUOS Crystal, because it has more pixels per display inch, a much better 1080 x 2160px resolution and a quite larger screen. Google Pixel 3 features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Sharp AQUOS Crystal, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Google Pixel 3 shoots a lot better videos and photos than Sharp AQUOS Crystal, because it has a way higher (4K) video quality and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels. Google Pixel 3 has a much better battery performance than Sharp AQUOS Crystal, because it has a 43 percent greater battery size.
Google Pixel 3 is a bit more expensive than the Sharp AQUOS Crystal, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.