Compare phones
Sharp AQUOS Crystal
306SHMotorola RAZR M
XT905
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 53.5 | 58.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sharp | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 4.4.2, 4.0.4 |
| -- | 2012-09-05 |
| 5.16 x 2.64 x 0.39 inches | 4.82 x 2.40 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 4.44 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 130.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 4.3 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 540 x 960 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED Advanced |
| 294 pixels per inch | 256 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 8926 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 1,5 GB RAM | 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.37 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | -- |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.62 | 1.32 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.48 | 6.27 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 5.5 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2040mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 13 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola RAZR M has a score of 58.9, which is a bit better than the Sharp AQUOS Crystal's 53.5 overall score. Both phones in this comparison review have the same Android 4.4.2 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect. The Motorola RAZR M construction is thinner and somewhat lighter than Sharp AQUOS Crystal.
Motorola RAZR M's processing unit is very similar to the processing unit in Sharp AQUOS Crystal, although the Motorola RAZR M has an inferior number of cores , a worse graphics processing unit and 512 MB less RAM memory. Sharp AQUOS Crystal features a bit better looking display than Motorola RAZR M, because it has a better resolution of 1280 x 720px, a just a little better screen pixel density and a bigger screen.
The Sharp AQUOS Crystal features a way bigger memory to store more games and applications than Motorola RAZR M, because it has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB. Motorola RAZR M's battery life is very similar to Sharp AQUOS Crystal's battery performance, although the Motorola RAZR M has a 2 percent smaller battery capacity.
Sharp AQUOS Crystal takes better photographs and videos than Motorola RAZR M. They have the same video frame rates, the same (Full HD) video resolution and a back camera with an 8 MP.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, the Motorola RAZR M is also the cheapest, making it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.