Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| Android 13 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2023-05-11 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.50 x 2.80 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Khaki Green and Platinum Silver | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3840 x 1644 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 643 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.74 inches (1/1.35") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia 1 V is just a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo, with an 82.7 score against 77.9. The Xperia 1 V construction is noticeably newer and extremely thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo's, but it's just a little bit heavier. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Xperia 1 V has the older 13 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a more vivid display than Xperia 1 V, although it has a just a little lower pixel density, a way smaller screen and a way lower resolution of 2560 x 1440. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a lot better processing power than Xperia 1 V, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and lesser cores , it also counts with an extra GPU.
The Xperia 1 V features a way better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xperia 1 V also has better 120 frames per second video frame rates, a back facing camera with a much better resolution and a bigger camera aperture to take better photos and video in low-light situations.
Sony Xperia 1 V has much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Sony Xperia 1 V has longer battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 28% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.