Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android |
| 2023-05-11 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.50 x 2.80 x 0.33 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Khaki Green and Platinum Silver | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3840 x 1644 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | TFT |
| 643 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.74 inches (1/1.35") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.43 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is a little bit better than Sony Xperia 1 V's 82.7 score. Despite being the best cellphone in this review, we must highlight that it's also much older, just a little thicker and just a little heavier. Samsung Galaxy A32 works with Android operating system, while Sony Xperia 1 V comes with Android 13 operating system.
The Sony Xperia 1 V has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a same size display, the Sony Xperia 1 V also has much more pixels per display inch and a lot higher resolution of 1644 x 3840px. The Xperia 1 V counts with slightly more memory for games and applications than Galaxy A32, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
Galaxy A32 has a really superior hardware performance than Xperia 1 V, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Xperia 1 V captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A32, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same resolution back-facing camera, the Xperia 1 V also counts with faster video frame rates.
The Xperia 1 V and the Galaxy A32 count with incredibly similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.