Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| Android 13 | Android 14 |
| 2023-05-11 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.50 x 2.80 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Khaki Green and Platinum Silver | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 3840 x 1644 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 643 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.74 inches (1/1.35") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia 1 V is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with an 82.7 score against 77.8. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS, but Sony Xperia 1 V has older 13 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. Sony Xperia 1 V's body is lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it is thicker and was released just 11 months before.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much more vibrant display than Xperia 1 V, because although it has a much lower quantity of pixels per screen inch and a bit lower resolution of 2200 x 2480, it also counts with a larger display. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a bit more powerful processor than Xperia 1 V, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than Sony Xperia 1 V, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography in low-light situations, a camera in the back with more MP, a bigger camera sensor taking better quality photos and videos and a way higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Sony Xperia 1 V, because it has 512 GB internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a bit longer battery performance than Xperia 1 V, because it has a 14% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.