Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-29 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.57 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Purple and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 948.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 3840 x 1644 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 643 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia 1 is a little bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting an 82.6 score against 77.8. Xperia 1's body is lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it's noticeably thicker and was released 5 years before. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a better looking screen than Xperia 1, because although it has a lot less pixels per inch in the display and a little bit worse resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels, it also counts with much more brightness and a larger screen.
Xperia 1 has a really superior performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 10 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Sony Xperia 1, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much longer battery lifetime than Sony Xperia 1, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 3330mAh. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Xperia 1, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a way more MP camera in the back and a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Xperia 1 is also by far the cheapest one, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.