Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.18 x 2.72 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia 10 II is slightly better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a overall score of 78.5 against 77.8. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but Xperia 10 II has an older 10 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. Xperia 10 II is a older and incredibly thicker phone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Sony managed to make it notably lighter anyway.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better looking screen than Xperia 10 II, because although it has a little worse screen density, it also counts with a lot higher 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution and a way bigger display. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a quite bigger storage to store more apps and games than Xperia 10 II, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Xperia 10 II features a way better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 12 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures greater photographs and videos than Xperia 10 II, because it has a camera with a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photos and video and a lot better video definition.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better battery duration than Sony Xperia 10 II, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.