Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-06-11 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.08 x 2.69 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia 10 III is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a general score of 83.7 against 77.8. Even though Xperia 10 III is notably older and way thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still noticeably lighter. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xperia 10 III has the previous 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better looking display than Sony Xperia 10 III, because although it has a little lower quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 and a lot bigger screen. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features more memory capacity for apps and games than Xperia 10 III, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Sony Xperia 10 III features a much faster CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much better pictures and videos than Xperia 10 III, because it has a much higher video resolution, a much more MP back camera, a bigger aperture for better low light captures and video and a much larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with greater battery life than Sony Xperia 10 III, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.