Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-02-27 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.57 x 2.87 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 430.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a general score of 77.8, which is a bit better than the Xperia 10 Plus's 75.4 score. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a a lot newer and incredibly thinner phone than Xperia 10 Plus, although it is heavier. The Xperia 10 Plus features a much better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 12 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much more vibrant screen than Xperia 10 Plus, because although it has a little bit lower pixel count per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger display and a much higher 2200 x 2480 resolution. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Xperia 10 Plus, because it has a lot more megapixels camera, a lot bigger sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photographs, a larger aperture and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Xperia 10 Plus, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Sony Xperia 10 Plus, because it has a 90 percent greater battery size.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Sony Xperia 10 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Sony Xperia 10 Plus. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Sony Xperia 10 Plus, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.