Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-08-24 |
| -- | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 449 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snpadragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,46 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 16.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 is much better than the Sony Xperia 10 VI, getting an 87.1 score against 73.2. The Galaxy Note9 has a much faster processing unit than Sony Xperia 10 VI, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a better looking display than Sony Xperia 10 VI, because it has a higher 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution, a quite greater quantity of pixels in each inch of display and a little bit bigger display.
Xperia 10 VI features a greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note9, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Xperia 10 VI also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,46 TB. Xperia 10 VI features longer battery duration than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 takes slightly better videos and photos than Xperia 10 VI, because although it has a camera in the back with a lot worse 12 megapixels resolution and a way smaller sensor, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.