Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-02-27 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.14 x 2.68 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.03 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little bit better than Xperia 10, with a 77.8 score against 73.7. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro design is incredibly newer and notably thinner than the Xperia 10's, although it's notably heavier. Xperia 10 counts with a way better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much sharper screen than Xperia 10, because although it has a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a lot higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and a much bigger screen. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures a lot better pictures and videos than Sony Xperia 10, because it has a lot larger sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photos, a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a bigger aperture to take better photography and video in low light situations and a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Xperia 10, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a really longer battery lifetime than Xperia 10, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity instead of 2870mAh.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xperia 10, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xperia 10. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Xperia 10, and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.