Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.2 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-10-12 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.22 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Grey | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 848.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 449 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia 5 II has an overall score of 87.2, which is better than Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 global score. The Xperia 5 II construction is extremely newer, a little lighter and way thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a more vivid display than Sony Xperia 5 II, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display pixel density and a slightly higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
The Sony Xperia 5 II has a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and a higher number of faster cores. The Sony Xperia 5 II shoots slightly better videos and photos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a lot worse 12 MP resolution back facing camera and a worse video resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture.
The Sony Xperia 5 II features a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal storage capacity. Xperia 5 II features a little better battery life than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3900mAh.
Although Xperia 5 II is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Droid Turbo. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.