Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.2 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-10-12 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.22 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Grey | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 848.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 449 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Sony Xperia 5 II is better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, getting an 87.2 score against 77.9. The Sony Xperia 5 II body is a lot newer, way thinner and just a bit lighter than Motorola DROID Turbo. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a brighter display than Xperia 5 II, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and more pixels per screen inch.
The Sony Xperia 5 II has just a little better hardware performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM and 4 more processing cores. Xperia 5 II captures a bit better videos and photos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a camera in the back with a much worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low light photography.
Sony Xperia 5 II counts with a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. The Xperia 5 II has a bit superior battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3900mAh.
Although Xperia 5 II is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola DROID Turbo. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Motorola DROID Turbo, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.