Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-12 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.22 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Grey | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 848.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 449 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia 5 II has a global score of 87.2, which is much better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's overall score of 77.8. Xperia 5 II is a way older and way thicker cellphone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Sony managed to make it much lighter anyway. Xperia 5 II counts with a much powerful CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much sharper display than Xperia 5 II, because although it has a just a bit lower display density, it also counts with a lot better 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution and a lot bigger screen. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a greater storage to install applications and games than Xperia 5 II, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior battery performance than Xperia 5 II, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better camera than Xperia 5 II, and although they both have the same aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a lot more mega pixels back camera, a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a lot larger back camera sensor.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Xperia 5 II is also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.