Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-10-02 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.22 x 2.68 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Grey and Red | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 848.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 449 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia 5 has a general score of 81, which is just a bit better than Moto Z Force's overall score of 75.8. The Xperia 5 construction is way newer, but just a little heavier and thicker than the Moto Z Force. The Moto Z Force counts with a slightly better looking display than Xperia 5, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a little bit higher count of pixels per inch of display.
Xperia 5 counts with just a little better processing power than Moto Z Force, because it has a higher number of faster cores and 2 GB more RAM. The Moto Z Force counts with a little bit more memory to install games and applications than Xperia 5, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola Moto Z Force features just a bit better battery life than Xperia 5, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity against 3140mAh. The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a slightly better camera than Xperia 5, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Moto Z Force also counts with a much better resolution back-facing camera.
Although Sony Xperia 5 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto Z Force. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Motorola Moto Z Force, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.