Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-10-02 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.22 x 2.68 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Grey and Red | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 848.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 449 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia 5 is a little bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting an 81 score against 80.1. Sony Xperia 5's body is much thinner and lighter than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even when both were only released with a few months difference. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little sharper screen than Xperia 5, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels count per inch of screen and a bit higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
The Sony Xperia 5 has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB, the Sony Xperia 5 also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Xperia 5 counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xperia 5 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a superior battery lifetime than Sony Xperia 5, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3140mAh. The Xperia 5 shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality videos and photos and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for shooting pictures in low-light situations, and they both have the same resolution back camera, the Xperia 5 also counts with a lot higher video definition.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, Xperia 5 is also by far the cheapest one, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.