Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 51.5 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 4.1 | Android 4.0 |
| 2012-12-05 | 0000-00-00 |
| 4.47 x 2.43 x 0.43 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.08 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 99.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 165 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227A chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A5 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 200 (enhanced) (200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 7.47 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (VGA) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.17 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 4 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 530 hours standby time 6.2 hours talk time | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 3.28 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S III Cricket is way better than the Xperia E, getting a 71.5 score against 51.5. The Galaxy S III Cricket is a noticeably thinner but somewhat heavier device than Xperia E. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy S III Cricket has 4.0 version and Xperia E has Android 4.1.
The Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a better processing power than Xperia E, because it has a better graphics co-processor running at 400 MHz, a greater amount of RAM and more cores. The Galaxy S III Cricket features a much sharper screen than Xperia E, because it has a way bigger display, a way better 1280 x 720 pixels resolution and way more pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a greater camera than Xperia E, because it has a lot better 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and a much higher resolution camera in the back. The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Sony Xperia E, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 64 GB and 28 GB more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has a superior battery life than Xperia E, because it has a 2100mAh battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket costs a bit more than the Sony Xperia E, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.