Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 51.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 4.0 | Android 10 |
| 2012-12-05 | 2018-10-18 |
| 4.47 x 2.43 x 0.43 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.08 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 165 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227A chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A5 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 200 (enhanced) (200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.47 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 5.06 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 530 hours standby time 6.2 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is much better than the Xperia E dual, getting a overall score of 81.2 against 51.6. The LG V40 ThinQ is a noticeably newer and way thinner cellphone than Xperia E dual, although it's also noticeably heavier. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the LG V40 ThinQ has a more recent 10 version and Xperia E dual has Android 4.0 version, offering some extra features and a performance increase.
LG V40 ThinQ has a much more vibrant screen than Sony Xperia E dual, because it has a lot greater display density, a lot bigger display and a lot better 1440 x 3120 resolution. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with much more memory capacity for apps and games than Sony Xperia E dual, because it has 64 GB internal memory and an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a much better processing power than Xperia E dual, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and faster). The LG V40 ThinQ captures greater photos and videos than Xperia E dual, because it has a way higher resolution camera in the back and a way higher video resolution.
LG V40 ThinQ features a superior battery performance than Xperia E dual, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
The LG V40 ThinQ not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.