Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 61.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 4.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-08-19 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.51 x 2.83 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 229 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8926 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.38 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 595 hours standby time 11.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is a lot better than the Xperia M2 Aqua, getting a general score of 83.7 against 61.7. The LG V50 ThinQ design is newer and just a little thinner than Xperia M2 Aqua's, although it's heavier. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS, but LG V50 ThinQ has newer 10 version and Xperia M2 Aqua has Android 4.4 version, so it counts with some additional features and performance optimizations.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a more vivid screen than Sony Xperia M2 Aqua, because it has a much better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels, a much bigger display and much more pixels per display inch. LG V50 ThinQ features a superior memory to install games and applications than Xperia M2 Aqua, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a quite superior processing power than Sony Xperia M2 Aqua, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of cores. LG V50 ThinQ has a very superior battery duration than Sony Xperia M2 Aqua, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 2300mAh.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a much better camera than Xperia M2 Aqua, because it has a camera with a much better 12 megapixels resolution and a way better (4K) video quality.
LG V50 ThinQ is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the Xperia M2 Aqua, which makes it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.