Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 54.3 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 4.0.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 4.76 x 2.41 x 0.48 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.64 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 245 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8255 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Scorpion (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB (333 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 205 (245 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 7.56 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 307,2 MB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 2.22 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.59 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 575 hours standby time 7.9 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is much better than the Xperia neo L's 54.3 score. The LG V50 ThinQ is a much thinner but much heavier cellphone than the Xperia neo L. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version and Xperia neo L has Android 4.0.4 version.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a brighter display than Sony Xperia neo L, because it has way more pixels per inch of screen, a really larger screen and a way better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Sony Xperia neo L, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ features a way better processing power than Xperia neo L, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and more cpu cores. The LG V50 ThinQ takes a lot better photos and videos than Sony Xperia neo L, because it has a lot better 12 megapixels resolution back facing camera, a lot bigger camera aperture and a lot higher (4K) video definition.
LG V50 ThinQ features a much better battery duration than Sony Xperia neo L, because it has a 167% larger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the LG V50 ThinQ is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.