Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 96.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-12-10 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.54 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Frosted Black | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 3840 x 1644 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 643 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 22.92 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia PRO-I has a score of 96.3, which is much better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's global score of 77.8. Despite being the best in our current comparison, it must be told that it's also a lot older, a little bit heavier and a lot thicker. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Xperia PRO-I has the older 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
Sony Xperia PRO-I has a really superior processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a brighter screen than Xperia PRO-I, because although it has a way lower count of pixels in each display inch and a bit worse 2200 x 2480 resolution, it also counts with a larger display.
Xperia PRO-I has a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Xperia PRO-I also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better camera than Sony Xperia PRO-I, because it has a back camera with a much higher resolution, a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a bigger aperture and a way bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photos.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has improved battery lifetime than Xperia PRO-I, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.