Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.3 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2021-01-26 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.70 x 3.00 x 0.40 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2500.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3840 x 1644 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 643 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 22.92 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia PRO is a lot better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, with a overall score of 94.3 against 77.9. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Xperia PRO has the previous 10 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version. The Xperia PRO design is newer and a little bit thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo's, but it's also incredibly heavier.
Xperia PRO has just a bit better processing power than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with 4 more cores and a higher amount of RAM. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a little sharper display than Xperia PRO, although it has a way worse resolution of 2560 x 1440px, a quite worse pixels density and a really smaller display.
The Sony Xperia PRO counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a back camera with much less MP and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better captures in poorly lited situations. Xperia PRO counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that supports up to 1 TB.
The Sony Xperia PRO counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Xperia PRO is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola DROID Turbo. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola DROID Turbo, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.